912
Lectures Watched
Since January 1, 2014
2400+ courses starting
in Feb-Mar 2019
Peruse my collection of 275
influential people of the past.
View My Class Notes via:
Receive My Class Notes via E-Mail:

VIEW ARCHIVE


Contact Me via E-Mail:
edward [at] tanguay.info
Notes on video lecture:
Hominin Species and Speciation
Choose from these words to fill the blanks below:
look, afarensis, East, hominim, differences, gradual, relationship, Sex, morphologically, reproduction, fossil, range, clearly, smaller, bonobos, humans, anatomical, million, complete, anamensis, natural, paleoanthropologists, reproducing, habitats, accepted, replace, biological, protecting, bounded, naturalists
why are species                from each other
we would expect to find
               changes in the fossil record
gradual gradations among living organisms, i.e. a continuous            of species of animals
explanation
as gradual changes occurred, they became more and more adapted to smaller                 
those gradations gave rise to large populations and                populations
more populous species would continually                the smaller ones
in Darwin's day, the fossil record was not very                 
today we have extraordinary records of some lineages
hominins
from Australopithecus                   
to Australopithecus                   
two species that lived between 4.2 and 2.9 million years ago
across much of          Africa
we see in them a record of gradual change
in Darwin's time, species were simply what                        said they were
they understood the morphological variation, i.e. study of the size and shape of                      features
Darwin's book: The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to       
concerned with the topic of whether different kinds of              should be called different species or not
"It is a hopeless endeavor to decide this point until some definition of the term species is generally                 . We might as well attempt without any definition to decide whether certain number of houses should be called a village, town, or city. We have a practical illustration of the difficulty in the never-ending doubts of whether many closely allied birds, mammals, insects, and plants which represent each other respectively in North America and Europe should be ranked as species or geographical races."
when                                          name species in much the same way today, just in more sophisticated terms
the evidence that we use to decide whether members of a species have a close                          is not often evidence that is closely at hand
the                      species concept
a species is a population that includes all of the populations that can actually or potentially reproduce with each other in their                habitat
this definition focuses on                         
it doesn't matter in principle how different the members of these species         
as long as they are                        with each other in their natural habitats, in their natural populations
chimpanzees
exist in at least four sub-populations across equatorial Africa
their close relatives the                separated from the chimpanzees more than a million years ago
chimpanzee subspecies have existed for more than a half-               years
there is not much evidence that early hominim populations were comparable in their                        to one another as we see with chimpanzees and bonobos
but the difference between sub-species and species can be seen as arbitrary and depends on one's intentions
many conservation biologies who are concerned about                      chimpanzees want to emphasize the biological differences between the different groups and would prefer that different sub-species be called different species
many biologies who are studying the fossil record who are trying to understand how various fossil forms are                                different and might be related to each other, are not ready to test how different those morphological differences are consistent with populations who are exchanging significant amounts of genes
Australopithecus afarensis is a descendant of Australopithecus anamensis
why don't we just call them one species?
we don't know that Australopithecus afarensis is the only decendent of Australopithecus anamensis
we later have more evidence of various                groups adapting to different kinds of ecologies
but until there is more information, paleontologists prefer to give groups names so they can communicate about them               
but we often don't have enough information to know when and where major changes might have arisen
the name gives paleontologists a way to deal with variation and to approach the hypotheses
when it is argued whether a species is valid or not, it is being argued whether one can trace the              record with the evidence that is available, or whether addition discoveries need to be made to find the common ancestors of these groups

Spelling Corrections:

decendentdescendant
paleonthologistpaleontologist

Ideas and Concepts:

Edgy definitions via this morning's Human Evolution course:

"In Darwin's book, 'The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex', he was concerned with the topic of whether different kinds of humans should be called different species or not.

He writes, 'It is a hopeless endeavor to decide this point until some definition of the term species is generally accepted. We might as well attempt without any definition to decide whether certain number of houses should be called a village, town, or city. We have a practical illustration of the difficulty in the never-ending doubts of whether many closely allied birds, mammals, insects, and plants which represent each other respectively in North America and Europe should be ranked as species or geographical races.

Paleoanthropologists name species in much the same way today, it is just that they use more sophisticated terms. But much of the evidence that we use to decide whether members of a species have a close relationship or not is not often evidence that is closely at hand.

The most common criteria used today to determine species is called the biological species concept which basically states that a species is a population that includes all of the populations that can actually or potentially reproduce with each other in their natural habitat. This definition focuses on reproduction, so it doesn't matter in principle how different the members of these species look or are formed, as long as they are reproducing with each other in their natural habitats, in their natural populations."
Rising Star Expedition - Fall 2013
Savanna Chimpanzees
The Molecular Clock
What is Biological Evolution?
The Place of Ardipithecus
Hominid Bipedality
Early Hominins
Hominin Species and Speciation
The Laetoli Footprints of Australopithecus afarensis