EDWARD'S LECTURE NOTES:
More notes at http://tanguay.info/learntracker
C O U R S E 
Key Constitutional Concepts and Supreme Court Cases
Professor Kermit Roosevelt, III, University of Pennsylvania
https://www.coursera.org/course/constitution
C O U R S E   L E C T U R E 
Structural, Backward-Looking, and Forward-Looking Provisions
Notes taken on October 30, 2014 by Edward Tanguay
•
how do we know what the Constitution means?
•
the people who wrote it believed many things that we don't believe now
•
that white men could own black slaves
•
that the government could deny the vote to free blacks and women
•
that men should not be allowed to marry other men
•
so in some ways, our constitutions is different than the framers Constitution
•
does the fact that our values have changed mean that our understanding of the Constitution should change
•
or is the meaning fixed for all time?
•
this is one of the debates in constitutional law
•
1. originalism
•
meanings of Constitution shouldn't change
•
cases must be decided the same way today as they would have been when the Constitution was ratified
•
if you want to change it, there is an Amendment provision to do that
•
2. "the living constitution"
•
constitution changes with the times
•
cases are decided in a way that makes sense for today
•
the Constitution is intended to last for a long time and has to grow with our changing society
•
you have to look how the constitution's values are applied to today's circumstances
•
the Supreme Court has generally followed this kind of evolutionary theory
•
states used to:
•
segregate public schools and buses and railroad cars by race
•
ban interracial marriage, and prevent women from being lawyers
•
courts ruled that at various times in history that the Constitution was allowed states to do all these things
•
but then without a change to the words of the Constitution, the courts said that states could indeed not do these things
•
almost no one would be happy if the Supreme Court started to decide cases as they would have been decided back in the 18th century when the Constitution was ratified
•
3. reconciliation
•
Constitutional meaning does not change over time (Originalist claim)
•
yet application of rights changes over time (living constitutionalists)
•
example
•
suppose you wanted to make sure that the Senate was respected
•
the key to respect was dressing well
•
"While engaged in debate, the Senators shall wear the latest fashions"
•
so wearing a powdered wig in 2014 would be violating the clause
•
the clause itself tells you to look to what the people consider to be fashionable at the time
•
three main types of provisions that you find the Constitution
•
1. structural provisions
•
the structure of the government
•
these meanings don't change
•
cases comes out the same way today as at ratification
•
2. backward-looking provisions
•
look back to something that happened in the past and say: we should never do that again
•
e.g. banning slavery
•
e.g. banning the lodging of troops in people's houses
•
we experienced these things and decided they were bad for the country
•
3. forward-looking provisions
•
the meaning of the clause doesn't change
•
but cases may come out differently based on how society has changed
•
e.g. states can't segregate their schools
•
e.g. states can't ban interracial marriage
•
the constitutional provision being enforced is the Equal Protection Clause
•
prohibits states from engaging in unfair or oppressive discrimination
•
the courts say: in deciding what is unfair or oppressive, we are going to look at what people think now and not what they thought hundreds of years ago