EDWARD'S LECTURE NOTES:
More notes at http://tanguay.info/learntracker
C O U R S E 
Western Civilization: Ancient and Medieval Europe
Ian Moulton, Arizona State University
https://www.edx.org/course/western-civilization-ancient-medieval-asux-hst102-0
C O U R S E   L E C T U R E 
Differences between Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt
Notes taken on March 20, 2016 by Edward Tanguay
•
kingship and law in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt
•
environment, climate, and geography affect societal order
•
things that humans can't change
•
society order is usually seen as the law
•
but when no laws in place, it's
•
the relationship between the ruler and the ruled
•
the relationship of the ruled in terms of each other
•
societies and leaders understand order differently
•
sources of social order and why it was forced the way it was
•
myths
•
law codes
•
architecture
•
religious beliefs
•
civilizations in Mesopotamia and Egypt
•
Egypt civilization arrives after the Sumer civilization in Mesopotamia
•
3500 BC
•
likely some contact between them
•
but Egypt developed essentially as a distinct civilization of its own
•
in both places, social order changed as the value of the land increased
•
the kind of kingship depended on location of civilization
•
if people were passing through who might pose a threat
•
if they were being left alone
•
if others could attack without notice
•
Mesopotamia
•
volatile rivers
•
changing weather
•
people who move across this landscape
•
so for leaderships and religion
•
theme of rivalry
•
who is going to contend
•
how might one win
•
the land of warring sky gods
•
gods that can rival the king
•
gods represented in things like lightening, thunder and dust storms
•
generally threatened people as a whole but could also threaten a king
•
a king is supposed to lead
•
if regular warfare, these skills are important
•
cities almost always had walls
•
a sign that there was always some threat afoot
•
growing population in cities
•
suggests increased social problems
•
the god-king must be a warrior and dominate
•
people have recourse
•
don't have a vote
•
but can ask gods for help
•
king is expected not to interfere with the established order, should respect gods
•
Epic of Gilgamesh
•
tells the story that the king is not supposed to abuse power and what the gods do when he does
•
Egypt
•
also a relationship between religion and leadership
•
but a greater theme of balance
•
the "land of divine harmony"
•
the goddess Ma'at was in charge of balancing conflicting cosmic forces
•
Egypt was different than Mesopotamia
•
a more of less consistent environment with regular flooding of the Nile
•
consistent agricultural production as well as herding
•
had fewer invaders given their geography
•
desert and sea around them
•
fewer people were going to be wandering through or have access to their resources
•
here God is truth, law, and justice, and if the Pharaoh doesn't keep this balance, then the are may be subject to problems
•
the Nile might become irregular
•
an invasion might occur
•
strength and production might decrease
•
comparing Mesopotamia and Egypt
•
differences
•
different geographies
•
different threats
•
different understandings therefore of order
•
unlike the Code of Hammurabi and other Mesopotamian law codes, there isn't a law code found in Egypt
•
although in Egypt a well ordered society was an absolute priority
•
there is a theme of balance in Egypt vs. the conflict and required dominance seen in Mesopotamia
•
similarities
•
a god-king
•
an implied recourse that the people should have to their gods if the king doesn't act correctly
•
land is in both cases is at the resources