|  | C O U R S E   L E C T U R E  Changes in Capitalism between the Wars Notes taken on August 27, 2019 by Edward Tanguay | 
 
the First World War brought the competing imperial systems, tension, and disequilibrium to a head
 
 
the peace of 1918/19 didn't create a durable peace as its architects sought out
 
 
the tension would persist until well into 1945
 
 
a Thirty Years War with pauses and truces throughout
 
 
especially when you look at Asia during this period, war was much more common than peace
 
 
this epic of world history brought the old Imperial systems' contentions to a head with a human toll that the planet had never seen and which we would never see again
 
 
during this time came a crack in the economic system
 
 
aggravated the tensions that lurked in the wake of the so-called peace
 
 
collapse of financial, commercial and the first age of real globalization
 
 
took highly highly integrated global arrangement and fractured it
 
 
it took just a few short years to break this down
 
 
a village will produce for its own consumption
 
 
but what happens over the centuries when you separate production from consumption
 
 
the 19th century was the high water mark, never had we seen such a separation between the two
 
 
some countries produced manufactured goods (Britain), and some produce primary staples (India)
 
 
transcends national boundaries
 
 
each country is specializing
 
 
to protect their own jobs, each unit breaks the bonds
 
 
people became disillusioned with the orthodoxies of liberal economics
 
 
goes through a kind of transformation as a result of watching this happen
 
 
the completely free marketplace was no longer a reality for healthy economics
 
 
there was a turn away from the liberal formula
 
 
by 1937, we start to see a slow recovery
 
 
what eventually brought the world out of the economy tailspin were the demands of the wartime economy
 
 
public policy experiments
 
 
states were faster than markets
 
 
capitalist, communist and colonial economies relied on the state as an engine
 
 
the depression had locked itself into a steady state
 
 
the command economies did better
 
 
didn't just put money in pockets
 
 
state took over production itself
 
 
this was new in the global economy for a state to play such an aggressive role
 
 
all societies became mass societies
 
 
experiencing pressure on the part of civilians to recovery
 
 
mass production societies
 
 
his workers should be able to afford an automobile
 
 
they can be the consumers of what they produce
 
 
a conceptual breakthrough
 
 
recombine production and consumption
 
 
paradox of modern capitalism
 
 
while it created more integration, it created more volatility
 
 
put pressure on states to integrate societies vertically
 
 
resolving these problems was the challenge of the 1930s