EDWARD'S LECTURE NOTES:
More notes at http://tanguay.info/learntracker
C O U R S E 
Moral Foundations of Politics
Ian Shapiro, Yale University
https://www.coursera.org/learn/moral-politics/
C O U R S E   L E C T U R E 
The Eichmann Problem
Notes taken on April 22, 2016 by Edward Tanguay
Eichmann
1961 the Israeli Secret Service, the Mossad
discovered that Eichmann was living under an assumed name in Buenos Aires
they went there and kidnapped him
brought him back to Israel
charged him with
crimes against humanity
crimes against the Jewish people
they sentenced him to death
executed him
who was Eichmann?
a concentration camp and transportation logistics manager
he was not a designer of the "final solution" but an implementer
personal characteristics
looked like anyone we know
not obviously an extremely unethical person
he wanted to please his superiors
he wanted them to think he was doing well
one must ask how he didn't question his actions
what makes us most uncomfortable about Eichmann's actions?
the banality of evil
what unnerves people about Eichmann is that he doesn't seem that different from any of us
it's important to question what my actions are producing, e.g. are they producing harm or not
it seems Eichmann didn't ask this question at all
he seemed to have no interest in the purpose of what he was doing
"My interest here was only in the number of transport trains I had to provide. Whether they were bank directors or mental cases, the people loaded on these trains meant nothing to me. It was really none of my business."
he wanted to do as good of a job as possible without any reference to the goods, he wanted to be a good manager
he believed that you could separate means from ends
he speaks about being a good manager without reference to what he was managing
he didn't make any moral judgement of his own
he seemed to have no moral compass
it didn't occur to him that he should, perhaps, question the authority that he was being asked to obey
he didn't ask any moral questions about the rightness of what he was doing
what the Israeli government did
they found out where he was living
brought him back to Israel
passed laws to try him by including a death penalty
then tried him and executed him
the State of Israel had not existed in the 1940s when he committed his crimes
the judicial system exceeded its authority
they kidnapped him from another country
didn't go through any appropriate channels
Argentina probably wouldn't have extradited him
the moment he became alerted to the fact that Israel was looking for him, he probably would have disappeared
so they had no intention of going through the appropriate legal channels
NATO bombing of Kosovo
March-June 1999
to protect Kosovar Albanians from ethnic cleansing and murder
but they didn't have UN Security Council Authorization for doing this
it would have been opposed by the Russians and the Chinese
violated the UN Charter
since nobody was threatening to attack a NATO country
after the Kosovo affair
an independent international commission established in August 1999 concluded that the NATO military intervention was illegal but legitimate
all diplomatic avenues had been exhausted
1994 genocide in Rwanda
Clinton administration failed to intervene
therefore 800,000 to 1,000,000 people were slaughtered
this is the kind of situation where you are going to have to ask for forgiveness rather than permission
because if you ask for permission, by the time you get permission, if you ever get it, the disaster will already have occurred
when moral considerations are sufficiently compelling, it becomes unavoidable that you make the decision to act and you recognize that what you are doing is illegal, but it will be forgiven afterward